How does 'normal' Internet browsing look today? Now we know

It's 7:15 americium connected a Friday morning, and Jordan wants to download an exertion to their laptop. They cognize the app by name, oregon truthful they think; they unfastened a caller tab successful their Internet browser and mistype the app's name. The mistake brings them to a malicious website that looks similar a morganatic site, lone it isn't, causing Jordan to download an app containing malware. Jordan's machine is present infected with malware.

Jordan is simply a existent person, though their sanction isn't truly Jordan. They were a subordinate successful a caller survey by CyLab researchers that aimed to larn what "normal" Internet browsing looks like. Such datasets didn't antecedently exist, but present that 1 does, researchers tin amended recognize however radical similar "Jordan" are led to download malicious contented and travel up with ways to forestall that from happening again.

Their study, titled "How Do Home Computer Users Browse the Web?" was published successful the latest contented of ACM Transactions connected the Web.

"The extremity for this insubstantial was to beryllium a instauration that different researchers could use," says CyLab's Kyle Crichton, a Ph.D. pupil successful Engineering and Public Policy and the study's pb author. "Now that we cognize what mean behavior looks like, we tin commencement to place anomalous behaviour and statesman to code immoderate fig of information challenges."

To make their dataset, the authors of the survey observed the browsing behaviour of 257 consenting participants done the Security Behavior Observatory (SBO), a radical of participants consenting to person their regular computing behaviors observed. One mightiness deliberation consenting to being monitored whitethorn pb 1 to enactment a spot antithetic than they usually would, but Crichton says helium doesn't judge that happened here.

"In general, determination was a important fig of visits to perchance pirated streaming websites, pornographic websites, and gambling websites," Crichton says. "Therefore, we presume that they were mostly behaving arsenic they usually do."

So what does "normal" browsing look like? Lots of browser tab usage—some usage conscionable a fewer and immoderate usage a ton—and astir clip is spent connected the apical 1% of websites.

"People walk astir of their clip connected a tiny fig of websites," says Crichton. "Fifty percent of people's browsing clip is spent connected astir 30 websites, among millions of websites."

Occasionally, Crichton says, radical extremity up astatine what helium refers to arsenic "the periphery" of the Internet—relatively debased postulation websites that are commonly associated with riskier content. These sites are often adware, gambling, pornography, and perchance amerciable streaming websites.

"We observed a batch of radical who started retired astatine a fashionable streaming work similar Netflix oregon Hulu, and they indispensable not person recovered what they wanted, past they'd leap retired to the periphery," Crichton says.

While the survey whitethorn service arsenic a instauration for different researchers to use, it'll bash truthful lone until people's browsing behaviour evolves capable to necessitate signaling a caller baseline, which Crichton says is inevitable.

"When Google came retired successful the precocious 90s, people's mode of uncovering contented rapidly changed," helium says. "People's browsing behaviour shifted again erstwhile tabbed browsing was introduced successful the mid-2000s. It's these crippled changers that are introduced, and things rapidly evolve."

---

---

More information: Kyle Crichton et al, How Do Home Computer Users Browse the Web?, ACM Transactions connected the Web (2021). DOI: 10.1145/3473343