Facebook provided false testimony in campaign transparency lawsuit, Washington attorney general says

A Facebook typical provided mendacious grounds successful a suit that accuses the societal media elephantine of violating authorities run concern laws, Washington Attorney General Bob Ferguson alleges successful tribunal filings.

Both Facebook and Facebook's attorneys knew the grounds was false, Ferguson says successful court filings. He besides alleges that Facebook acceptable up a formalized process for radical seeking information connected governmental ads that requires them to bounds their requests "in nonstop contravention of Washington law."

Ferguson sued Facebook past year, for the 2nd time, alleging the institution has "repeatedly and openly" violated authorities run transparency laws by selling governmental ads without providing legally required details of the spending.

"Facebook is simply a commercialized advertiser, yet it views itself supra this law," Ferguson writes successful a caller filing. "Even aft a erstwhile suit and the archetypal ailment successful this case, it inactive refuses to supply the nationalist entree to each required accusation astir governmental ads."

Facebook did not instantly respond to a petition for comment. The institution has argued, and continues to, that Washington's run concern laws are unconstitutional and interruption some the First Amendment's escaped code protections and the Commerce Clause, which gives Congress the powerfulness to modulate interstate commerce.

In a tribunal filing, it says that it did not supply mendacious grounds due to the fact that the contented the Attorney General's Office was asking astir was extracurricular the agreed upon scope and clip frame.

Ferguson's archetypal suit against Facebook, filed successful 2018 implicit the aforesaid issue, ended with the institution paying a $238,000 fine.

Both lawsuits fundamentally allege the aforesaid thing: That Facebook has been selling governmental ads successful Washington without making information, required by authorities law, astir the ads and the radical buying them disposable to the public.

Washington's strict run concern laws necessitate advertisement sellers specified arsenic Facebook to disclose circumstantial accusation connected the names and addresses of radical who bargain ads, who ads people and the full fig of views of each ad.

Facebook calls the instrumentality "onerous" and says it violates the First Amendment by compelling the institution to marque governmental speech—information astir who is buying governmental ads—that it would not different make.

"Washington's instrumentality forces backstage parties to convey state-mandated messages to the nationalist connected demand, connected symptom of terrible fines for nonaccomplishment to bash so," the institution wrote past year, asking for the suit to beryllium dismissed.

It is not amerciable for Facebook to merchantability governmental ads, nor is it amerciable for candidates oregon extracurricular groups to bargain them. But, aft the 2018 lawsuit, Facebook voluntarily announced that it would halt selling governmental ads successful Washington.

It didn't.

The institution sold astatine slightest 171 ads to Washington authorities governmental committees, which paid the institution astatine slightest $525,000 since November 2018, according to the Attorney General's Office. For example, the institution accepted ads successful Seattle's 2019 City Council races, arsenic good arsenic for a wide array of different campaigns crossed the state, including candidates for authorities representative, the Port of Tacoma commission, Spokane's City Council and Vancouver's schoolhouse board.

Facebook, successful a tribunal filing, admits it has sold governmental ads successful Washington aft it said it would halt doing so. It said radical and organizations who bargain those ads are violating its policies and that it takes them down erstwhile it discovers them.

Facebook has made immoderate details of governmental ads crossed the state disposable done a searchable nationalist Ad Library. However, the room does not see each the legally required accusation for ads moving successful Washington state.

The suit against Facebook was initially spurred by requests for advertisement accusation from 2 people: autarkic writer Eli Sanders and governmental advisor Tallman Trask. (Both Sanders and Trask are present students astatine the University of Washington School of Law.)

Sanders and Trask asked for accusation connected ads Facebook was selling and erstwhile they didn't get it, the authorities Public Disclosure Commission started an investigation. That yet led to the lawyer general's lawsuit, aft the PDC declined to settee with Facebook.

As portion of the lawsuit, the Attorney General's Office deposed a Facebook programme manager. Lawyers asked him if determination were immoderate instances, different than the ones brought by Sanders and Trask, erstwhile radical had requested accusation connected Washington political ads connected Facebook.

He said determination were none, according to tribunal documents.

"Both Facebook and its counsel were alert that grounds was false," Ferguson writes.

Facebook's attorneys did not object, tribunal filings say, and later, erstwhile Facebook attorneys corrected the deposition transcript, they made nary changes connected that question.

In fact, Zach Wurtz, a governmental researcher, had made astatine slightest 9 abstracted requests and had been successful nonstop connection with Facebook's counsel, according to tribunal filings.

"Facebook's misconduct prevented the State from learning astir the further undisclosed violations," Ferguson wrote.

And, Ferguson says, Facebook told Wurtz to capable retired a signifier successful bid to get information, asking him to corroborate helium was a Washington nonmigratory and asking him for circumstantial URLs of the ads helium was funny in. State instrumentality allows anyone to petition information, not conscionable Washington residents, and it does not necessitate a requester to supply circumstantial URLs.

---

---

©2021 The Seattle Times
Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.